Archive for 2005

Nemesis Program?

Ok, this is pretty random, but it's weird. I have a set of scratches on my left shoulder. That may not be weird in and of itself, but the weird part is that I have absolutely no idea how they got there. None whatsoever. They just appeared one morning. I got out of bed as usual, got in the shower as usual, and noticed these scratches. These aren't little tiny scratches, either, they're big. They were about four to five inches long each, and fairly wide for scratches. They've since gotten smaller, but still.

How do I not remember something putting huge gashes in my shoulder?? What could possibly have done this to me? Unless I have an invisible, silent cat with no fur prowling around my house and scratching me in my sleep, I can't think of any way I could have gotten scratched on my shoulder. Maybe I'm turning into the Nemesis. (from Resident Evil, if you don't get the reference… go rent the Resident Evil movies and you'll understand) I'm just confused as to how I could forget something like this happening.

That's just weird.

Comments (12)

Musical Boredom

Usually I leave my WinAmp on shuffle. That way I get to hear a little of everything from my playlist. If it starts playing a song I like, or a song that I know is close to another song I want to hear, I can just click to that song quickly. However, lately I've noticed myself hitting the 'next' button more and more frequently. For some reason, nothing seems to strike my fancy anymore. Don't get me wrong, I like almost every song on my playlist. Why would the song be on my playlist if I didn't like it? But lately I just keep skipping songs because it's just not what I feel like listening to. Problem is that I can't seem to find something I do want to listen to. As of this post, I have over 1500 songs on my playlist, and almost nothing I really want to listen to?? Something is wrong.

I live for music. The first thing I do when I get up in the morning is turn on the radio or Winamp, whichever is more immediately convenient. When I leave the house, I grab my iPod and scroll through the list looking for something to listen to on my way to class or wherever I might be headed. If I can't have music actually playing (like if I'm at work or in class or something) I almost always have something playing in my mind. Granted the clarity isn't perfect, and the words aren't always right, but it's close enough to keep me mostly sane until I can get some real music. Point being, I'm addicted to music. Of course, I can't play any instruments, can't sing, can't even read music to save my life. But I make up for that by listening to music as often as possible.

So why can't I find anything to listen to lately? Out of all my music, nothing is quite cutting it?? Why am I constantly cycling through my playlist looking for something else to listen to, when everything on my playlist is hand-picked because I like how it sounds? That just seems odd to me. Now I'm not about to delete all my music or anything; I do still like almost everything on my list (there are a few exceptions that I'm undecided on at the moment - I might delete a few albums that I'm not sure if they're my style or not), but I just don't feel like listening to most of it lately.

I'm always looking for new music that I might like. Amazon.com has a great feature where it lists items similar to the one you're currently looking at. So if you're looking at a CD by The Strokes, you might also be interested in The White Stripes or The Killers, for example. I've used that feature quite a bit in the last few months looking for new music, and it's usually got some good recommendations. I think I've done this before, but I'm looking for some recommendations from anyone who reads this. Any ideas of music I might enjoy, based on what you see on my existing playlist? Feel free to recommend artists/albums/songs…

Comments (3)

Who Cares?

On Yahoo News today was some video interview with none other than Paris Hilton. The whole premise of the interview was to have Yahoo members send in their questions for Paris so they could have her answer them.

You asked the questions, and Paris has answered them in this exclusive video interview.

Paris HiltonToday of course was the day the video was released. What I don't get is, who cares?? Who really still thinks that Paris Hilton is someone that we should care what she thinks?? She has consistently demonstrated that she has absolutely no mental abilities other than partying. Sorry, I mean “socializing.” Cause she's a “socialite.” What exactly is a “socialite,” you ask?

Someone who has money and doesn't work, instead devoting his/her life to being “socially active.” Socialites go to parties, gather media attention, and essentially “work” at being popular. This often comes at the expense of any meaningful contribution to society or culture (outside of catchphrases-that-aren't-really-catchphrases, like Paris Hilton's “That's Hot”).

- Urban Dictionary

Yeah. Basically she has done absolutely nothing at all worthy of being famous. The only thing she has going for her is her last name, which she had nothing to do with. She's not even good-looking.

What I don't get is why anyone would want to have her answer their questions. Unless the question is something like “why are you such a pathetic human being?” in which case that's perfectly acceptable. Answer that one.

Comments (4)

Ties Are Ridiculous

the rope of death - a windsor knotI have to give a presentation tomorrow. That means business formal attire. That means a necktie. Thing is, I have no idea how to tie a tie. Yep. Never learned how. Never needed to. In my entire life, I've gotten away with only wearing a tie MAYBE twice, and both of those times I had to have my dad tie it for me. Sure, he tried showing me how to do it, but I just never got the hang of it.

I've always gone with the dress shirt, collar open at the neck (just dont close those little buttons that cut off airflow), and a nice beaded necklace. It looks nice. Unfortunately, that just doesn't cut it for “business formal.” So… I just spent a good half an hour in front of a mirror trying to figure this thing out. And with a bit of help from one of my roommates, I managed to get something that looks somewhat like a knot. It's atrocious, but it's passable.

What I don't get is why we need to wear ties in the first place. Why do we tie knots in silk ropes around our neck? Is it supposed to symbolize our wish that we'd rather die than be wearing these clothes? It has to.

P.S. That's not my tie in the picture. It's something I found on Google. My tie is much nicer.

Comments (9)

Debate Time

DEBATE!!! Yes. I've finally… finally… gotten around to putting the debate together. Honestly I'd like to be able to structure it a little better, but this is good enough as is. Ideally it should be argument 1, questions; argument 2, questions. Counterargument 1, questions; counterargument 2, questions. And so on. But… without a huge amount of coordination or a formal meeting of the participants, that's not possible. Especially with the number of people who said they want to contribute.

Feel free to participate (as long as you follow the rules) or just watch from the sides. Topic: “Downloading vs Purchasing Music.”

EDIT #1 (9:04pm): Sorry…. my bad. I managed to screw up part of the code… all better now.

EDIT #2 (12:35am): Just to clarify… you have to click the link above to go to the debate. Or this one.

EDIT #3: The debate is no longer viewable, following the server switch in March 2006.

Comments (2)

Geek Novels

I saw this on a different blog, and it originally came from Guardian Technology blog. There was a poll in the GTB and these were apparently the Top 20 Geek Novels. I've linked to the ones I have already read:

  1. The HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy - Douglas Adams
  2. Nineteen Eighty-Four - George Orwell
  3. Brave New World - Aldous Huxley
  4. Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? - Philip Dick
  5. Neuromancer - William Gibson
  6. Dune - Frank Herbert
  7. I, Robot - Isaac Asimov
  8. Foundation - Isaac Asimov
  9. The Colour of Magic - Terry Pratchett
  10. Microserfs - Douglas Coupland
  11. Snow Crash - Neal Stephenson
  12. Watchmen - Alan Moore & Dave Gibbons
  13. Cryptonomicon - Neal Stephenson
  14. Consider Phlebas - Iain M Banks
  15. Stranger in a Strange Land - Robert Heinlein
  16. The Man in the High Castle - Philip K Dick
  17. American Gods - Neil Gaiman
  18. The Diamond Age - Neal Stephenson
  19. The Illuminatus! Trilogy - Robert Shea & Robert Anton Wilson
  20. Trouble with Lichen - John Wyndham

I'm currently in the process of reading #5, Neuromancer, but just started it today. There's a few on this list that I've been wanting to read, but haven't had the time to get to. (4, 18, and 20 in particular) I have to recommend any books by Neal Stephenson, particularly Cryptonomicon. It's a bit lengthy, but very worth the time. Just thought I'd mention this, seeing as I obviously consider myself something of a geek. :-)

So… which ones have you read?

EDIT (17 June 2006): list updated to be current with books I've read

Comments (8)

Slight Change

Ok… this is a pretty small change, and it doesn't affect anything yet, but… I made a small change to the way individual posts are loaded. Before, it was

/blog.asp?t=20051126_Change

but now I've made it:

/blog.asp?id=20051126_Change

The idea behind this is that when I switch over to a PHP server in March (and all the code I've had to change to get ready for that), the system will hopefully work a little more like standard blogs, which typically use “id” for theirs. So… for the time being, any direct links you might have to posts of mine will still work with the “?t=”, but come March they won't work anymore. I'll hopefully have some kind of error page up with instructions on how to make the posts work again, but til then. Be aware.

EDIT: Those addresses are different now. See this post for more details on the switch.

Comments (5)

Write Protected

I'm sorry, that section of my brain appears to be write-protected.

- Thanks to Etanisla for this find.

Comments

Happy Thanksgiving

I realize the day is almost over for most people, but I wanted to say Happy Thanksgiving to anyone who stops by. Just remember. Today is NOT “Turkey Day.” It is Thanksgiving. Meaning, give thanks for all those things in your life that you appreciate. Having a roof over your head, food in your stomach, and clothes on your body. Things that many people in this world are not fortunate to have. Give thanks for all those things you have that you might take for granted. Your eyesight (even if it's not good - some people have none at all), your hearing (even if it's not good - some people have none at all), etc.

Happy day of giving thanks, everyone.

Comments (1)

Peace Mom

Ok, this isn't the rant I was expecting to write. I was going to write about something entirely different, but a headline on Yahoo! news caught my attention and demanded that I read it. I mean literally… it reached out of my screen and grabbed my hand, forcing me to click the link. I didn't want to, I swear.

Anyway. The headline in question was 'Peace Mom' Sheehan to Release Book. Now, if you're not familiar with the characters involved in this story, let me give you a quick crash course in pointless political maneuvering.

Cindy Sheehan is the mother of a soldier who died in Iraq. As a result of her loss, which I'll admit isn't something I'd want to deal with, she's decided to become a hardedge protester. She sat outside President Bush's Texas ranch for 26 days, refusing to leave until the President personally came and spoke to her. I don't think that ever actually came about. This is the woman who firmly stated that absolutely *nothing* could possibly get her to leave her post. Nothing. Then a little while after that rather bold remark, she left. Had to go see her ailing mother. Anyway, she's been leading this huge protest movement dubbed Camp Casey (after her son Casey who was killed). That's the quick and dirty rundown of the past year or so.

Now she's apparently releasing a book. Go figure. Big surprise there. The “peace mom” who's done nothing but create a headache for the country and the current administration while managing to garner massive amounts of attention in the media is now releasing a book??? You don't say. So much for staunch dedication to the memory of her son and honoring all the soldiers fighting for this country, now it's managed to become a convenient source of money. Apparently for the last who knows how long, she's been writing journal entries and updating her blog with her experiences and her thoughts on everything. Someone read it and decided that it'd be a great idea to make it into a book. What better way to promote her peace protest, right?

We got it done as quickly as we could, and the deepest reason is to stop the war.

Right. To stop the war. What about the profit to be made from selling 20,000 copies of a book by the peace mom herself? Nope. Nope. It's to stop the war. Definitely. Am I the only one who thinks this whole thing is less about her wanting to end the war on behalf of the unfortunate soldiers fighting and dying in the war, and more about her wanting media attention? It seems rather convenient that the woman who's been protesting the war and Bush's administration for a year now is suddenly releasing a book about her experiences for the sole reason of helping end the war? I guess I fail to see how that will help end the war or bring back soldiers. Maybe it's just me.

I know there's a legitimate side to her protests; I'm sure that losing her son was a horrific ordeal and that it put a lot of strain on her and her family. I'm sure that I would never want something like that to happen to me. However, just because you've had a terrible loss and want to keep others from that kind of loss doesn't give you the right to harass the President of the United States and be an arrogant attention-seeker. At one point in the article, it quotes her:

Get used to it, George. We are not going away.

Excuse me? At what point do you get to call the President by his first name? Yes, in the United States of America, we are all granted the right of free speech (more on that one later) and are allowed to criticize the government. In fact, we're encouraged to do so. But that does not mean you don't have to accord respect to those in positions of authority. The President of the United States is not your buddy, he is the Commander in Chief. You don't get to call him “George.” Whether or not you agree with Bush, whether or not you agree with the war, whether or not you think Twinkies are tasty, whether or not you like anything about this country… none of it gives you the right to be an idiot. Cindy Sheehan is less of a “peace mom” than an attention whore who right now is conveniently finding a quick way to boost attention for something that's been slipping from the media spotlight recently.

Another thing somewhat related to this that drives me (more) insane is hearing people state:

He's not my President. I didn't vote for him.

No, I'm sorry, he is still your President. See, that's how a republic like ours works. We have these things called elections every four years. If you're eligible, which most of this country is, you get to go vote for your chosen candidate. Whoever gets the most votes, wins. (No arguments about Bush's first win, there were more circumstances surrounding that one that I'm not gonna go into now.) If you choose not to vote, then you lose ALL rights to complain about who wins. Granted, there are problems with this system; it's not perfect. Nothing is. Ideally, we'd have more than the two candidates - admit it, it's a two-party system - and it wouldn't be necessary to stand in line for 8 hours to vote. But still, this is the system that's worked pretty well and pretty bloodlessly for the last 200 years. Now that everyone's voted and the winner has been chosen, he (or she, possibly) gets to be President of the United States of America for the next four years. It's pretty simple, really. I don't care who you voted for, the President is still your President. You don't get to deny that fact.

Quick synposis: Sheehan finds way to get another media publicity spree. Expect to see her on Oprah and Letterman. I wouldn't doubt it if she finds time to pry herself away from her protest to make a publicity tour, book signings, you know. Sorry Cindy, your fifteen minutes were up long ago.

Comments (1)